Unlock value that's already there.

Cost Segregation Study

CGM Cost Segregation Duda Widget Preview
Cost segregation studies

Commercial real estate assets are rarely one asset.

Building acquisitions, renovations, tenant improvements, and capital investments often contain components that may qualify for shorter recovery periods than the structure itself. CG Moneta Consulting helps organizations evaluate whether asset classifications appropriately reflect the underlying property, supported by engineering analysis, documentation review, and tax advisor coordination.

Discuss Eligibility Review Study Criteria
Engineering-based review

Study readiness depends on asset detail, construction records, cost allocation, and defensible classification support.

CPA coordination

CGM helps align property owners, finance teams, engineers, and tax advisors around the facts before a study advances.

Executive commercial real estate planning discussion
Classification drives timing.

The question is not whether a building has value. It is whether the property components have been reviewed with enough detail to support the proper recovery period.

Industry reality

Why cost segregation reviews are frequently delayed.

Depreciation decisions are often made during transactions, construction closeout, or tax filing cycles when the available information is incomplete. Once the property is placed in service, the assumptions may remain untouched for years.

A disciplined review revisits the property with a different lens: construction detail, asset use, invoices, fixed-asset records, and engineering support. The objective is to determine whether a deeper study is justified and whether the records can support the conclusion.

Executive business review discussion for commercial real estate planning
01

Acquisition-related costs may be recorded at a high level even though the property includes electrical systems, site improvements, finishes, specialty equipment, and other components that require more detailed review.

02

Renovations and tenant improvements may be capitalized without a separate assessment of how the underlying assets should be classified for depreciation purposes.

03

Existing properties may remain on legacy depreciation schedules because no one has coordinated facilities records, accounting records, and tax advisor review after the initial transaction.

Review areas

Areas frequently overlooked during property reviews.

Cost segregation is not a generic savings exercise. It is a property-specific review of facts, records, and asset classifications. CGM frames the work around property history, documentation readiness, engineering support, and CPA coordination.

Commercial building acquisition and asset review
Building acquisitions

Acquired properties may contain assets that warrant separate classification review.

Purchase accounting and closing records often provide only part of the picture. A cost segregation review examines whether building components, site improvements, and certain property-specific assets should be analyzed separately from the overall structure.

  • Review purchase, appraisal, and fixed-asset records
  • Identify property components that require engineering analysis
  • Coordinate study considerations with the existing tax advisor

Executive question: have acquisition-related assets been evaluated beyond standard building classifications?

Renovation and capital improvement review
Capital improvements

Renovations and tenant improvements can change the depreciation discussion.

Facility upgrades may involve electrical work, plumbing, flooring, millwork, lighting, site improvements, and specialty buildouts. When projects are completed under tight operating timelines, the tax classification review may be deferred or never performed.

  • Review construction invoices, change orders, and project schedules
  • Separate building-related costs from potentially shorter-lived assets
  • Assess whether additional technical review is justified

Executive question: were capital projects reviewed through a cost segregation framework when completed?

Existing property documentation and depreciation review
Existing properties

Properties held for several years may still deserve review.

Organizations sometimes assume cost segregation must occur immediately after purchase or construction. In practice, existing properties may warrant evaluation depending on ownership history, available records, tax posture, and advisor review.

  • Review placed-in-service history and depreciation schedules
  • Assess whether records support a look-back evaluation
  • Clarify whether the potential benefit justifies the study effort

Executive question: has the property ever been reviewed using engineering-based asset classification methods?

Asset classification

Cost segregation does not create deductions. It changes the timing of depreciation.

CGM's existing cost segregation framework emphasizes a critical distinction: the review does not invent new tax deductions. It evaluates whether property costs have been classified in a way that reflects the underlying assets, recovery periods, and available documentation.

Residential rental / nonresidential real property 27.5 / 39

Longer-lived real property

Residential rental real property and nonresidential real property are generally depreciated over longer recovery periods. A study helps determine which costs should remain in this category and which may require separate review.

Personal property 5 / 7

Shorter-lived assets

Certain interior components, equipment-related infrastructure, specialty systems, or property-specific assets may warrant shorter recovery-period analysis when properly supported.

Land improvements 15

Site-related improvements

Exterior improvements such as certain paving, landscaping, site utilities, and related property components may require a separate classification discussion.

Executive takeaway: the classification discussion should be grounded in source records, engineering detail, cost reconciliation, and CPA review rather than broad estimates or unsupported assumptions.

Quality study standards

What the IRS expects to see in a quality study.

The IRS Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide is designed to help examiners evaluate studies submitted to support depreciation deductions. For executives, the practical takeaway is clear: methodology, cost support, engineering detail, and documentation quality matter before a study is relied upon.

01

Engineering analysis

Asset classifications should be supported by construction knowledge, property detail, and a defensible method rather than broad percentage estimates.

02

Cost reconciliation

Study conclusions should tie back to actual costs, acquisition records, invoices, fixed-asset schedules, and other source documentation.

03

Classification support

The work should explain why specific assets are treated differently from the building structure and how each conclusion was reached.

04

Documentation readiness

Executives and advisors should understand what evidence exists, what is missing, and whether additional review is needed before relying on the study.

Executive considerations

What finance and real estate leaders should review before commissioning a study.

A strong cost segregation decision is not based on a headline benefit. It depends on property basis, available records, ownership objectives, tax posture, and the quality of the specialists involved.

Decision factors

Property basis

Is the property or project large enough to justify the level of analysis required?

Documentation availability

Are construction records, invoices, drawings, depreciation schedules, and project details available?

Ownership horizon

How long does the organization expect to hold the property, and how does that affect the planning discussion?

Advisor questions

Tax posture

How will accelerated depreciation interact with the organization’s current and future tax position?

Study timing

Should the review occur during acquisition, construction closeout, annual planning, or a later property review?

Implementation

How will study findings be reviewed, documented, and integrated with the company’s tax filing process?

Evaluation process

How cost segregation studies are evaluated.

The process should move from preliminary screening to documented decision-making. CGM helps organize the right records, participants, and specialist review so executives and advisors can determine whether the study should proceed.

01

Review property history

Screen acquisitions, renovations, placed-in-service dates, ownership history, and existing depreciation treatment.

02

Gather cost records

Locate invoices, construction schedules, drawings, fixed-asset records, appraisals, and project documentation.

03

Evaluate classifications

Identify asset categories that may warrant separate engineering and tax review.

04

Coordinate analysis

Align property stakeholders, engineers, cost segregation specialists, and tax advisors around the facts.

05

Support advisor review

Help ensure conclusions, records, and methodology are ready for CPA review and implementation decisions.

CGM role

Where CGM supports the process.

CGM is positioned for organizations that need disciplined review coordination, not a replacement for their tax department. The model connects executive decision-makers, real estate stakeholders, construction records, engineering review, and CPA coordination.

The goal is to help determine whether a cost segregation study is appropriate, whether the records are strong enough, and how the work should be coordinated with existing advisors.

Specialist network

Access to cost segregation and engineering resources aligned to the property type and review need.

Record readiness

Organization of source documents, cost records, property data, and advisor questions.

Executive clarity

Clear framing for leaders who need to understand timing, documentation, and next steps.

CPA alignment

Coordination with existing tax advisors so the study fits the broader filing and planning process.

Executive advisory team reviewing commercial property documentation
Executive questions

Questions leaders often ask before moving forward.

Cost segregation decisions should be made with a clear understanding of property facts, records, advisor involvement, and implementation requirements.

When does a study usually make sense?

A study is most often considered after a building acquisition, new construction, major renovation, tenant improvement project, or review of an existing property with meaningful depreciable basis.

Can existing properties be reviewed?

Yes. Existing properties may warrant evaluation depending on ownership history, placed-in-service timing, available records, and tax advisor review.

What records are typically needed?

Helpful records may include construction invoices, drawings, contracts, change orders, appraisals, purchase documents, fixed-asset schedules, depreciation records, and project summaries.

How does engineering analysis support the study?

Engineering review helps identify building components, evaluate asset use, allocate costs, and support classification conclusions with property-specific detail.

How does the process work with the CPA?

CGM helps coordinate the review so the CPA can assess tax treatment, implementation, reporting, and filing implications before the study is relied upon.

Is this only about accelerating deductions?

No. The stronger framing is decision readiness: whether the property facts, records, methodology, and advisor review support a classification position that should be implemented.

Next step

Discuss whether a cost segregation study is appropriate.

Review property characteristics, construction history, ownership profile, and documentation availability to determine whether a cost segregation evaluation should move forward.

Schedule Consultation