ELEVATE MEDICAL

Revenue Cycle Forensic Audit

Elevate Medical Revenue Cycle Forensic Audit

Understand reimbursement exposure.

Every engagement begins with a complimentary forensic audit designed to identify reimbursement leakage, denial exposure, payer variance, and operational constraints affecting financial performance.

Phase 1 — Forensic Audit

A forensic review of performance.

The Elevate forensic audit evaluates reimbursement performance, denial exposure, payer behavior, coding variance, unresolved receivables, and operational inefficiency across the revenue cycle.

The objective is straightforward: establish executive visibility into where financial performance is deteriorating and why.

Documentation integrity Documentation completeness, coding variance, and charge capture exposure.
Claims performance Submission delays, denial trends, clearinghouse inefficiencies, and unresolved edits.
Payer variance Underpayments, reimbursement inconsistency, escalation failures, and contract-related exposure.
A/R exposure Aging receivables, stalled collections activity, unresolved balances, and follow-up breakdowns.
Workflow breakdown Operational bottlenecks, fragmented handoffs, avoidable rework, and reporting gaps.
Revenue integrity Areas where reimbursement performance is delayed, reduced, or structurally constrained.

Advisory Baseline

Most revenue cycle engagements begin too late.

Traditional RCM engagements often begin with operational execution before leadership has visibility into the underlying causes affecting reimbursement performance.

The Elevate model establishes the forensic baseline first. Operational intervention follows the findings.

Audit Methodology

From forensic review to operational action.

The audit connects historical activity to root causes, financial exposure, and the corrective priorities most likely to improve performance.

01 — Analyze

Review performance data.

Billing, coding, reimbursement, denial, payer, and A/R activity are reviewed across historical data.

02 — Isolate

Identify root causes.

CGM identifies the operational and reimbursement drivers contributing to delayed or reduced collections.

03 — Quantify

Prioritize exposure.

Findings are prioritized by financial impact, operational urgency, and recoverability.

04 — Translate

Define the path forward.

The audit becomes an executive roadmap for remediation, selected support, or full RCM management.

Executive Audit Deliverable

A roadmap for corrective action.

The forensic audit concludes with a structured executive deliverable outlining operational findings, reimbursement exposure, remediation priorities, and recommended engagement pathways.

Findings Root causes affecting reimbursement and operational performance.
Financial exposure Areas where revenue leakage, payer variance, or delayed collections appear most significant.
Priorities The issues requiring immediate corrective attention.
Pathways Recommended remediation and operating support models.

Phase 2 — Revenue Cycle Engagement

Operational support informed by findings.

After the audit, CGM can engage through targeted remediation or complete revenue cycle management, depending on the findings and the level of operating support required.

Targeted Remediation

Stabilize operational performance.

Focused intervention across denial recovery, payer escalation, workflow correction, coding variance, reimbursement recovery, billing execution, follow-up, A/R recovery, credentialing, and reporting.

Complete RCM Management

Lead end-to-end revenue cycle operations.

Comprehensive operational management supported by continuous billing execution, certified coding infrastructure, denial recovery discipline, A/R acceleration, and executive reporting.

AI-Enabled RCM Overlay

Operational intelligence supporting revenue cycle execution.

CGM applies AI-enabled workflow support across revenue cycle operations to improve prioritization, accelerate follow-up activity, surface denial patterns earlier, strengthen reimbursement visibility, and support more consistent operational execution.

The overlay supports — but does not replace — certified coding expertise, payer escalation, reimbursement strategy, or operational leadership.

Denial trend visibility Surfaces recurring denial drivers and payer behavior trends.
Reimbursement variance detection Supports earlier identification of underpayments and payment inconsistency.
Work queue prioritization Prioritizes claims, denials, and receivables requiring action.
Continuous A/R follow-up Helps maintain follow-up discipline across aging balances.
Documentation and coding support Supports documentation review and coding workflow discipline.
Executive reporting visibility Improves visibility into operational activity, financial exposure, and remediation progress.

The objective is operational acceleration, improved financial visibility, and more disciplined revenue cycle execution across complex healthcare environments.

Operational Infrastructure

Infrastructure for complex healthcare systems.

CGM combines certified coding depth, operational execution, denial recovery infrastructure, and executive reporting discipline to support complex healthcare environments.

Coding Depth
3,000+

Certified coders supporting specialty-specific revenue cycle needs.

Specialty-aligned coding support is designed to strengthen documentation integrity, coding accuracy, compliance confidence, and reimbursement performance.

Continuous billing execution Daily claim activity and continuous follow-up reduce reimbursement delays created by batch workflows.
A/R acceleration Structured workflows improve collections velocity and surface aging risk earlier.
Continuous operational coverage Revenue cycle execution continues beyond standard operating hours.
Executive reporting Leadership visibility into operational and financial performance.

Engagement Process

From findings to execution.

A structured path from forensic review to operational execution.

01 Initial executive discussion
02 Operational and reimbursement review
03 Forensic audit analysis
04 Executive findings presentation
05 Remediation or operational engagement

CGM vs. Traditional RCM

A more accountable revenue cycle model.

CGM begins with forensic visibility, then aligns remediation and operating support to the findings.

Traditional RCM
CGM Elevate Model
Execution begins immediately.
Engagement begins with forensic visibility.
Standardized workflows.
Audit-informed operational intervention.
Periodic billing cycles.
Continuous billing execution.
Limited operational visibility.
Executive reporting discipline.
Fixed service models.
Targeted remediation or full RCM management.

Begin With Clarity

Begin with the audit.

Begin with a confidential executive discussion regarding reimbursement performance, denial exposure, operational challenges, and revenue cycle priorities.

Schedule Executive Review