Every transaction should deliver value.

Credit Card Processing

Merchant Processing Expense Review

Reduce merchant processing expense with independent financial visibility.

CG Moneta Consulting helps healthcare organizations evaluate card-acceptance costs, isolate processor economics, and improve transaction-level financial performance without selling payment processing services.

Independent Advisory Positioning

Independent from processing sales.

CGM does not sell merchant processing, resell payment services, or move providers into bundled processor contracts.

The engagement evaluates the provider’s existing processing environment and identifies practical opportunities for measurable savings.

Expense Review Scope

Where merchant processing costs increase.

Merchant processing expense is difficult to evaluate because interchange categories, processor markups, gateway costs, compliance charges, and contract terms are often spread across complex monthly statements.

Interchange exposure Assessment of interchange categories, card mix, and rate structures affecting acceptance cost.
Processor markup Evaluation of markup structure, discount rates, transaction fees, and tier inconsistencies.
Hidden fee layering Isolation of recurring charges that may add cost without clear operational value.
Gateway and equipment costs Assessment of terminal, platform, monthly, technology, and gateway-related charges.
PCI and compliance fees Review of recurring compliance, non-compliance, and administrative charges.
Contract inefficiencies Assessment of pricing restrictions, renewal exposure, processor terms, and vendor accountability.

Expense Review Methodology

A structured review of processing expense.

The methodology translates statement complexity into a practical view of commercial position, savings potential, and implementation priorities.

01 — Review

Merchant statements.

Statements, fee schedules, transaction activity, and recurring charges are collected and normalized.

02 — Analyze

Fee structure.

Key cost drivers are mapped across interchange, markup, gateway activity, compliance fees, and pricing tiers.

03 — Benchmark

Pricing efficiency.

The current commercial position is compared with expected cost structures and available alternatives.

04 — Evaluate

Contract exposure.

Renewal conditions, cancellation exposure, bundled charges, and processor obligations are assessed.

05 — Recommend

Cost reduction pathway.

Findings are converted into a prioritized reduction pathway.

06 — Support

Implementation guidance.

CGM supports execution while protecting payment workflow continuity.

Fee Structure

Paid from realized savings.

The service is structured around realized savings from implemented merchant processing improvements.

This keeps the engagement aligned with measurable financial improvement, not fixed consulting fees or unrelated vendor changes.

Savings-based commercial model.

CGM is compensated only from realized savings achieved through the expense reduction process. If savings are not implemented, there is no savings-based compensation to CGM.

Financial Visibility

Processing costs are often difficult to isolate.

Merchant processing statements often obscure the true cost of acceptance through fragmented pricing, interchange complexity, equipment charges, and limited commercial context.

Opacity Charges can appear across multiple categories, making total cost difficult to isolate.
Fragmentation Gateway, compliance, batch, authorization, and transaction fees may be distributed across separate statement lines.
Escalation Pricing may increase through renewals, processor markups, or incremental fee additions.
Benchmarking Leadership often lacks a clear basis for comparing the current commercial position.

Optimization Outcomes

Designed to improve processing efficiency.

The objective is to turn processing complexity into practical decisions that improve cost position, vendor governance, and operating stability.

Cost reduction Identify avoidable charges and pricing inefficiencies that can improve transaction economics.
Financial intelligence Translate statement complexity into a clearer view of commercial position and savings potential.
Fee rationalization Separate necessary processing costs from excessive, duplicated, or poorly explained charges.
Vendor governance Clarify where processor pricing, terms, or renewal practices require executive attention.
Operational stability Prioritize practical savings opportunities while protecting payment workflows.
Executive decision support Provide leadership with a concise roadmap for negotiation, implementation, and governance.

Begin With The Review

Begin with a processing expense review.

Schedule a confidential review of merchant processing statements, commercial position, and current vendor configuration.

Schedule Expense Review